|
Q Group President's ReportChristmas Dinner, 17 December, 1999IntroductionWith the retirement of Robert Blackwell at the end of last year, as the new president I have the privilege of presenting the Report for 1999. The topics pertaining to the Q Group that I would like to touch on tonight are:
Where We Have Come FromAs we approach our 10th anniversary, I thought it would be interesting for those of you not very familiar with our history to provide a quick summary. The Institute of Quantitative Research in Finance Inc., better known by its shorter name "Q Group", was founded in July 1990 under the guidance of our first President, Dr. Peter Vann. There were just 35 members, more than half of whom held PhDs, and membership conditions were comparatively restrictive. The mix of industry versus academics was not too dissimilar to what we have today. However, the mix of derivatives based quants to portfolio management quants was higher. A quick glance of current members names suggests a veritable United Nations style background. The first seminar meeting was quite a coup for the timeProf. Robert Jarrow as the key speaker presenting his working paper on the HJM model of options on interest rates using a term structure model. Discussants were Profs. Frank Milne and Stuart Turnbull. The Statement of Objectives and the Principal Activitieswhich Chris Condon quoted in last year's addresswere developed at the inauguration of the Q Group. The name "Q Group" is identical to that of a somewhat similar USA organization. I say "somewhat", because the latter is a corporate membership group, whereas we are an individual membership group. Historically we have no formal ties with the USA group, and only very loose informal connections. Subsequent presidents to Dr. Vann have been Drs. Les Balzer, Robert Blackwell and Garry de Jager. Where We Are TodayToday, the Q Group has 142 members. Membership requirements, whilst still strict, have been opened up somewhat, especially to encourage younger quants to become members. We have a thriving Melbourne chapter which has a slightly more academic flavour with 25 members. The Q Group has an Executive Committee consisting of the President, Vice-President, Treasurer and Secretary, and the heads of the sub-committees for Membership, Website, Sydney Events, and Melbourne based Events. The previously referred to Statement of Objectives and the Principal Activities have in fact remained unchanged since 1990, and this may generate some discussion for one of the later items on the Agenda for this AGM. Today, we have formal links with only one external group, that being the Securities Institute of Australia. They have performed various administrative tasks for us, and in both 1997 and 1998 we sponsored a joint conference. What We Have Done in 1999Turning now to the Q Group events for this year.
New Initiatives in 1999During the year several new initiatives were launched:
One initiative the Committee decided to forego was an idea floated by a Melbourne member which was mentioned in last year's President's Report, namely that the Q Group create a type of hedge fund using the current bank balance as working capital. A second idea noted in that Report was to use the current bank balance to sponsor research. Indeed, within the statement on "principal activities" there is provision to use surplus monies to fund specific research projects. This will reviewed with an eye on the trends of our bank balance, the worthiness of floated ideas for research, and the cost thereof. Where We Might Go in 2000 & BeyondI mentioned earlier in this Report that the Charter has remained unchanged since the foundation of the group. Some years ago two past presidents conducted a strategic review of the Q Group, investigating among other things the possibility of turning the Q Group into a more formal professional body (like the Australian Computer Society or the Institute of Engineers). After consultation with the membership, it was decided this was beyond the current resources of the group, and there was little support to fund extra resources. In a similar vein, on a number of occasions the issue of individual membership versus corporate membership has been reviewed. On each occasion the membership has voted strongly to maintain the current system. Reinforcing this view, last year's formal Survey generated some suggestions, but indicated members wished the group to continue operating as it is now. Given this background, the Committee is proceeding on the premise that the current Charter and mix of events is the most suitable and has the support of the membership. However, this in no way means the Committee or the Q Group as a whole is not open to suggestions for change. This applies not only to the use of surplus funds (if any), but to other opportunities, and indeed to the Charter itself should members so wish. For my own part, I would like the Q Group to achieve a few objectives next year:
Important Acknowledgements
GARY DEJAGER 17 December, 1999 |